Archive for the ‘Politics & Government’ Category

30 Little Known Facts about America

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Thirty documented legal facts that all U.S. debt slaves should know… with case sitings.

Reference:

home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.htm

www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html

www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

www.gnosticliberationfront.com/you_are_all_slaves.htm

Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0

UNITED STATES is a corporation

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

There are Two Constitutions

The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation.

Reference:

Visit www.commercialredemption.com and www.statusisfreedom.com
to learn how you were deceived and how to attain freedom from this corporation. Freedom is real and attainable.

Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0

It’s An Illusion, John Harris, A carpenters’ view

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

The truth is simple, mankind makes it complicated. If you haven’t heard this information before prepare to be amazed!

Reference: Magna Carta (Document included in common law in most all countries)

The People’s United Community: www.tpuc.org

Source: bbc5.tv/eyeplayer/articles/john-harris-carpenters-view

Gerald Celente Interviewed 10/09 by Project Camelot

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Gerald Celente the articulate and impassioned editor of Trends Journal interviewed by Project Camelot in Brussels, October 2009.

Visit Gerald Celente’s site: Trends Journal
TrendsResearch.com

Source: ProjectCamelot.org

Obama’s Birth Certificate

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Since before the election, there has been a call for proof that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President of the United States of America. All he has to do is provide his long form Birth Certificate, passports, and other documents to prove it, but rather than doing that, he has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to prevent the courts from requiring that he do just that. Why?

Source: Proof-Positive.com

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Article Published Sunday, June 27, 2004

by The Standard in Nairobi, Kenya

Of course, it’s no longer on The Standard’s website… but you just have to LOVE Archive.org in moments like this! Thank you, KR, for submitting this.

I have included the contents here (copied from Archive.org) just in case someone should either pay enough or “cause” the record of this article to disappear from Archive.org’s servers (like it has from the EAstandard.net website). Be sure to follow the link at the bottom of the article to view on Archive.org. Enjoy!

- ~ j ~

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race,” Ryan, 44, said in a statement. “What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play.”

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was “truly outrageous” that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

I feel for him actually,” Obama told a Chicago TV station. “What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody.

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state,” she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, “There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere.”

Current Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

Original Source: The Standard in Nairobi, Kenya
http://eastandard.net/

Ron Paul on Obama Winning Nobel Peace Prize

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

Say What? The Nobel Peace Prize!

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

By Southern Patriot

Shock is a mild explanation for what I felt today when I read at infowars.com that Obama had received the Nobel Peace Prize. I was always under the impression that the Nobel Prize for any accomplishment was awarded to people who stood out from their peers. So I ask, is the Nobel Committee completely brain dead? I thought it an outrage when Al Gore received the prize for his work with Global Climate change. But, Barack Obama? What idiot nominated him? As we jokingly say in the South, “What is they, stupid or sumthin’.”

Apparently, the whole Nobel system is rigged just like the Presidential elections. How else could this injustice have come to be? Obama is nothing more than a slick, smiling, snake oil salesman. He doesn’t care for this country. He surely doesn’t care for the people of this country. But, then again. Why should he?

This country represents everything he was taught his entire life to hate. From his associations with William Ayers to Reverend Wright, to his grooming under Henry Kissinger, he was destined for greatness at the expense of everything that made this country one of the greatest places in the world. He isn’t entirely to blame, since he is just a toady for the Globalist. He is worshiped as a hero by many. Yet in truth, he is nothing more than a lap dog for his handlers. When he is used up, he will be kicked out into the backyard and occasionally tossed a few meager scraps to make him think he is important.

I should pity him for his ignorance. But, I can’t. The Bible teaches I should pray for him. This also I cannot do. Even though he is just a puppet of the New World Order, I see him for what he is. A traitor. He, along with members of the Bush administration, should be tried and convicted for treason. And lastly be subjected to the same punishment awarded all traitors of the United States. I would finish this scenario, but it could be used against me by Homeland Security.

Obama may be remembered for being awarded the peace prize. He may be sitting in the White House smiling from ear to ear like the Cheshire cat, proud of himself. As his wife and children look up into his eyes lovingly, with such pride. But, those of us who’s brains aren’t clouded with moronic television programming know better. We know this is just another well run scam in the ongoing saga that is the presidency of Barack H. Obama.

Related: War Criminal Obama Deserves An Oscar, But Not A Nobel Peace Prize
http://www.infowars.com/war-criminal-obama-deserves-an-oscar-but-not-a-nobel-peace-prize/

Source: http://evervigilant1.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/say-what-the-nobel-peace-prize/

Congressional leaders fight against posting bills online

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent

As Congress lurches closer to a decision on an enormous overhaul of the American health care system, pressure is mounting on legislative leaders to make the final bill available online for citizens to read before a vote.

Lawmakers were given just hours to examine the $789 billion stimulus plan, sweeping climate-change legislation and a $700 billion bailout package before final votes.

While most Americans normally ignore parliamentary detail, with health care looming, voters are suddenly paying attention. The Senate is expected to vote on a health bill in the weeks to come, representing months of work and stretching to hundreds of pages. And as of now, there is no assurance that members of the public, or even the senators themselves, will be given the chance to read the legislation before a vote.

“The American people are now suspicious of not only the lawmakers, but the process they hide behind to do their work,” said Michael Franc, president of government relations for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

At town hall meetings across the country this past summer, the main topic was health care, but there was a strong undercurrent of anger over the way Congress rushed through passage of the stimulus, global warming and bank bailout bills without seeming to understand the consequences. The stimulus bill, for example, was 1,100 pages long and made available to Congress and the public just 13 hours before lawmakers voted on it. The bill has failed to provide the promised help to the job market, and there was outrage when it was discovered that the legislation included an amendment allowing American International Group, a bailout recipient, to give out millions in employee bonuses.

“If someone had a chance to look at the bill, they would have found that out,” said Lisa Rosenberg, who lobbies Congress on behalf of the Sunlight Foundation to bring more transparency to government.

The foundation has begun an effort to get Congress to post bills online, for all to see, 72 hours before lawmakers vote on them.

“It would give the public a chance to really digest and understand what is in the bill,” Rosenberg said, “and communicate whether that is a good or a bad thing while there is still time to fix it.”

What you don’t know can hurt you:

» House energy and global warming bill, passed June 26, 2009. 1,200 pages. Available online 15 hours before vote.

» $789 billion stimulus bill, passed Feb. 14, 2009. 1,100 pages. Available online 13 hours before debate.

» $700 billion financial sector rescue package, passed Oct. 3, 2008. 169 pages. Available online 29 hours before vote.

» USA Patriot domestic surveillance bill, passed Oct. 23, 2001. Unavailable to the public before debate.

A similar effort is under way in Congress. Reps. Brian Baird, D-Wash., and Greg Walden, R-Ore., are circulating a petition among House lawmakers that would force a vote on the 72-hour rule.

Nearly every Republican has signed on, but the Democratic leadership is unwilling to cede control over when bills are brought to the floor for votes and are discouraging their rank and file from signing the petition. Senate Democrats voted down a similar measure last week for the health care bill.

The reluctance to implement a three-day rule is not unique to the Democrats.

The Republican majority rushed through the controversial Patriot Act in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as well as a massive Medicare prescription drug bill in 2003 that added hundreds of billions of dollars to the deficit.

For the majority party, legislative timing plays a big role in whether a bill will pass because support can be fleeting.

“The leaders use it as a tool to get votes or to keep amendments off a bill,” said one top Senate Democratic aide.

But Baird warned of public backlash.

“Democrats know politically it’s difficult to defend not doing this,” he said. “The public gets this. They say we entrust you with the profound responsibility of making decisions that affect our lives, and we expect you to exercise due diligence in carrying out that responsibility.”

Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Congressional-leaders-fight-against-posting-bills-online-8340658-63557217.html

Susan Ferrechio Bio: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/bios/susan-ferrechio.html

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

Full Text Of Newsmax Column Suggesting Military Coup Against Obama

Here is the full text of John L. Perry’s column on Newsmax which suggests that a military coup to “resolve the Obama problem” is becoming more possible and is not “unrealistic.” Perry also writes that a coup, while not “ideal,” may be preferable to “Obama’s radical ideal” — and would “restore and defend the Constitution.” Newsmax has since removed the column from its website.

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

  • Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”
  • Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.
  • They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.
  • They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.
  • They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.
  • They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.
  • They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.
  • They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

References | Resources | Related Material

Source: Full Text Of Newsmax Column Suggesting Military Coup Against Obama
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2009/09/full_text_of_newsmax_column_suggesting_military_co.php?ref=fpblg

Tweet With Me
Websites & Resources
Categories