Admiral Dennis C. Blair

Posts Tagged ‘Admiral Dennis C. Blair’

Missile shield sacrificed for Trilaterals’ profit

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

By Patrick Wood

When Obama abruptly dropped the Eastern European missile shield, the real motive became quickly visible. Buried in a Reuter’s article was the following side note:

“Shortly after the pullback on the shield programme was announced, Russia’s government said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin would meet several U.S. executives on Friday from firms including General Electric, Morgan Stanley as well as TPG, one of the world’s largest private equity firms.”

In fact, all three companies mentioned have connections to the Trilateral Commission:

Dinakar Singh, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, TPG-Axon Capital, New York, NY; former Co-head, Principal Strategies Department, Goldman Sachs

Robert W. Lane, Board of Directors General Electric; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Deere & Company, Moline, IL

Lord Simon of Highbury, Senior Adviser of Morgan Stanley Europe; Member of the House of Lords, Deputy Chairman of Unilever; Non-Executive Director of Suez Group; former Minister for Trade & Competitiveness in Europe; former Chairman of BP, London

General Electric’s influence in the White House is second only to Goldman Sachs.

As noted in Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame, members of the Trilateral Commission have thoroughly saturated the Obama administration — 13 percent of the U.S. membership now hold critical positions, including,

Secretary of Treasury, Tim Geithner
Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
National Security Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
Deputy National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon
Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volker
Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
Assistant Secretary of State, Asia & Pacific, Kurt M. Campbell
Deputy Secretary of State, James Steinberg
State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Haass
State Department, Special Envoy, Dennis Ross
State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Holbrooke
Deputy Undersecretary of State for economic, energy and agricultural affairs, Robert Hormats

Note that Robert Hormats was vice-chairman of Goldman Sachs prior to his recent appointment. The economic development of Russia is part of his specific responsibilities.

The purpose of controlling the Executive Branch since the election of Jimmy Carter in 1976, has been to create insider business deals for themselves, at the expense of everyone else. The fact that Eastern Europe will now be at the mercy of Vladimir Putin and the Russian Bear doesn’t seem to bother the Trilaterals in the slightest.

Until this hegemony is exposed and broken up, there is zero percent chance of turning back Obama’s Marxist destruction of America as we know it today.

References | Resources | Related Material

Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame
http://www.augustreview.com/news_commentary/trilateral_commission/obama:_trilateral_commission_endgame_20090127110/

ANALYSIS-US firms, others may gain from shield pullback
http://www.reuters.com/article/asiaCrisis/idUSB688381

Obama helps strengthen General Electric-Putin ties
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obama-helps-strengthen-General-Electric-Putin-ties-59644627.html

List of Trilateral Commission Members
http://www.augustreview.com/knowledge_base/getting_started_with_globalism/trilateral_commission_membership_-_2008_20081010103/

Source: http://www.augustreview.com/news_commentary/free_trade/missile_shield_sacrificed_for_trilaterals%27_profit_20090918150/

Twitter This

Tags: Admiral Dennis C. Blair, agricultural affairs, Ambassador to the United Nations, Asia & Pacific, Assistant Secretary of State, BP, Deere & Company, Dennis Ross, Deputy National Security Advisor, Deputy Secretary of State, Deputy Undersecretary of State, Dinakar Singh, Director of National Intelligence, Eastern Europe, Eastern European missile shield, economic, Economic Recovery Committee, energy, Executive Branch, Gen. James L. Jones, General Electric, Goldman Sachs, hegemony, insider business deals, James Steinberg, Jimmy Carter, Kurt M. Campbell, List of Trilateral Commission Members, Lord Simon of Highbury, Minister for Trade & Competitiveness in Europe, Missile shield sacrificed for Trilaterals' profit, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Europe, National Security Advisor, Obama, Obama Administration, Obama's Marxist destruction of America, Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame, Paul Volker, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Reuter's article, Richard Haass, Richard Holbrooke, Robert Hormats, Robert W. Lane, Russia's government, Russian bear, Secretary of Treasury, State Department, Suez Group, Susan Rice, Thomas Donilon, Tim Geithner, TPG, TPG-Axon Capital, Trilateral Commission, Unilever, Vladimir Putin, White House, world's largest private equity firms
Posted in New World Order | No Comments »

Rockefeller: Internet is “Number One National Hazard”

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

By YouDeserveToKnow

According to the great-grandson John D. Rockefeller, nephew of banker David Rockefeller, and former Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman, Jay Rockefeller, the internet represents a serious threat to national security. Rockefeller is not alone in this assessment. His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair.

“It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” Rockefeller mused during the confirmation hearing of Gary Locke (see video), Obama’s choice for Commerce Secretary. He then cites a dubious figure of three million cyber “attacks” launched against the Department of Defense every day. “Everybody is attacked, anybody can do it. People say, well it’s China and Russia, but there could be some kid in Latvia doing the same thing.”

Jay Rockefeller’s comments reveal an astounding degree of ignorance - or if not ignorance, outright propaganda. Since the September 11, 2001, attacks the government has cranked up the fear quotient in regard to cyber attacks and so-called cyber terrorism, a virtually non-existent threat except in the minds security experts and politicians. In the years since the attacks, not one real instance of real cyberterrorism has been recorded.

“Cyberattacks on critical components of the national infrastructure are not uncommon, but they have not been conducted by terrorists and have not sought to inflict the kind of damage that would qualify as cyberterrorism,” writes Gabriel Weimann, author of Terror on the Internet. “Nuclear weapons and other sensitive military systems, as well as the computer systems of the CIA and FBI, are ‘air-gapped,’ making them inaccessible to outside hackers. Systems in the private sector tend to be less well protected, but they are far from defenseless, and nightmarish tales of their vulnerability tend to be largely apocryphal.”

“Psychological, political, and economic forces have combined to promote the fear of cyberterrorism,” Weimann continues. “From a psychological perspective, two of the greatest fears of modern time are combined in the term ‘cyberterrorism.’ The fear of random, violent victimization blends well with the distrust and outright fear of computer technology.”

“The sky is not falling, and cyber-weapons seem to be of limited value in attacking national power or intimidating citizens,” notes James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Such a threat is overblown, Lewis explains. He notes that “a brief review suggests that while many computer networks remain very vulnerable to attack, few critical infrastructures are equally vulnerable.”

In other words, Rockefeller’s example of a kid in Latvia with a laptop posing a serious “hazard” to national security is little more than sensationalistic propaganda.

So-called cyber terrorists are far less of a threat than government. China and Australia have recently imposed draconian censorship on internet freedom. Brazil, Denmark, Canada, Finland, Ireland , Italy, Israel, the United Kingdom, the United States, and many other countries also impose nominal censorship on internet freedom. Urgent calls to restrict the medium in various ways through legislation and government action have increased over the last few years (for more detail, see Internet Censorship: A Comparative Study).
However, the real threat to internet freedom is currently posed by IT and ISP corporations, not the government.

As Alex Jones explained last June, large corporate ISPs are now in the process of imposing bandwidth caps and routing traffic over their networks and blocking certain targeted websites. For instance, in 2005 AOL Time-Warner was caught blocking access to all of Jones’ flagship websites across the entire United States. Other instances of outright censorship include the UK ISP Tiscali blocking subscribers from reaching material on the 7/7 London bombings and Google’s continued and habitual censorship of 9/11 material and Alex Jones’ films on the ever-popular YouTube. There are many other instances as well (see, Google Admits Censorship).

The PTB cannot stand the fact that they cannot control the internet. The cat is out of the bag. “They” can no longer control the masses with mainstream media propaganda. “They” have been exposed and can no longer keep the crimes they’ve committed hidden.

Cyber attacks is just one of their many lame excuses to attempt to justify trying to put the cat back in the bag… Yeah, good luck with that - NOT.